New strategies in several developed countries are being introduced in strategies to try to reduce the incidences of driving under the influence. The Pan-European police group,
Meanwhile Tispol reports that a culpability study from France has set out the relative risks of responsibility for a fatal crashes linked to driving under the influence of cannabis or alcohol. The study shows the potential for a 28% reduction in fatal collisions if no one drives over the alcohol limit.
The proportion of persons driving under the influence of alcohol was estimated at 2.1% and under the influence of cannabis at 3.4%. Drivers under the influence of alcohol were 17.8 times more likely to be responsible for a fatal crash, and the proportion of fatal crashes which would be prevented if no drivers ever exceeded the legal limit for alcohol was estimated at 27.7%.
Drivers under the influence of cannabis multiplied their risk of being responsible for causing a fatal crash by a factor of 1.65, and the proportion of fatal accidents which would be prevented if no drivers ever drove under the influence of cannabis was estimated at 4.2% (3.7%-4.8%).
Tispol has also released a report from the US, following discussions with its counterparts. This report shows nearly 2,000 lives could be saved each year win US roads if every state adopted a .05 BAC. An analysis of studies on lowering the BAC limit in the USA found a 5% decline in non-fatal alcohol-related crashes, a 9.2% decline in fatal alcohol-related crashes from lowering the BAC to .08, and an 11.1% decline in fatal alcohol-related crashes from lowering the BAC to .05 or lower. The study estimated that 1,790 lives could be saved each year if all states adopted a .05 BAC limit. This study provides strong evidence of the relationship between lowering the BAC limit for driving and the general deterrent effect on alcohol-related crashes.